Understanding the Value of Public Art: Introducing NEFA’s Public Art Impact Assessment

Public Art for Spatial Justice-supported North Shore CDC's A Dream called Home; mural by Atagracia Florium | photo by Y. Guzman, 2024

Presented by Arts Equity Group in partnership with the New England Foundation for the Arts' Public Art Team. Co-authors: Danielle Amodeo, Cidhinnia Torres Campos, Jameson DeNyse, Bulaong Ramiz.

Public art has always existed in complex, contested, and deeply unequal public spaces. Artists working in public navigate layered histories, present-day tensions, and structural constraints, while still finding ways to create connection, affirmation, and possibility. Across Massachusetts, public art practitioners have long demonstrated an ability to respond to these realities, transcend them, and generate ripple effects that extend far beyond a single site, moment, or grant period.

For five years now, the New England Foundation for the Arts (NEFA) has invested in public art rooted in spatial justice, equity, and community partnership. This grantmaking focus area has supported artists, organizers, and institutions working at multiple scales, from temporary interventions and temporal experiences to long-term, place-based projects embedded in local contexts. Together, this body of work reflects a field that is actively shaping how people experience place, history, and belonging.

In Summer 2025, NEFA partnered with Arts Equity Group (AEG) to lead a multi-year Public Art impact assessment. AEG brings a field-informed, research-driven, and relational approach to this work, bridging institutional strategy with lived artistic and community practice. This assessment begins with a shared understanding: public art is transformative.

Our goal is not to determine whether public art creates change, but to better understand how that change shows up, who is impacted, and how NEFA can continue to support and strengthen this social impact work over time.

This blog marks the first public update of an ongoing series. It is offered in the spirit of transparency and shared learning, which we hope will create space for continued conversation.

A group of young people pose together, in front of a mural. In front of them there are paint cans, signs that read "wet paint. don't touch," cardboard boxes, caution tape, etc.
Public Art for Spatial Justice-supported Chelvanaya Gabriel and YEA Collective's "Free Our Futures;" Springfield, MA youth pose with YEA Collective members Jessica Daury, Emilia Ditkoff, Aaron Richardson, Isis Badone, (kneeling) Alana Young-Morrison, and Mari “Mars” Champagne | photo by Julian Gabelus, 2021

What do we mean by "impact assessment?"

An impact assessment is a structured way of understanding and telling the story of change. For NEFA’s Public Art program, this means asking questions such as:

  • How do artists navigate complex social, political, and spatial conditions through public art?
  • What kinds of impacts unfold for communities, collaborators, and institutions over time?
  • How do ripple effects extend beyond individual projects to shape relationships, practices, and public dialogue?
  • Where do patterns of impact emerge across geography, scale, and approach?

This work moves beyond traditional metrics alone. While quantitative data is important, it rarely captures the nonlinear, relational, and long-term dimensions of public art practice. NEFA’s impact assessment is grounded in a values-based methodology that centers people, place, and lived experience.

Key principles guiding this work include:

  • People-first, relational approaches
  • Non-extractive engagement with artists and communities
  • Learning with the field, not evaluating it from a distance
  • Iterative reflection that allows insight to emerge over time
Venn diagram depicting that the overlap of data, storytelling, and spatial justice practice show core impacts. Venn diagram depicting that the overlap of data, storytelling, and spatial justice practice show core impacts. Image courtesy of Arts Equity Group.
Venn diagram depicting that the overlap of data, storytelling, and spatial justice practice show core impacts. Image courtesy of Arts Equity Group.

Identifying Threads of Connection & Shared Impacts 

NEFA already has some meaningful mechanisms in place to understand the value of public art, most notably through grantee reporting. Rather than introducing a new framework disconnected from existing practice, this assessment began by closely engaging with the information artists and organizations have already shared.

Over the past several months, our team conducted a comprehensive review of 235 grantee reports from NEFA's public art programs over the last five years, including:

Reading these reports collectively allowed us to look across projects and programs to identify recurring themes, shared challenges, and common forms of impact.  

This approach honors the labor embedded in reporting and positions artists’ reflections as a primary source of knowledge. By identifying these threads of connection, we’ve also been able to uncover shared impacts. This assessment allows NEFA to understand the outcome of its public art grantmaking over time, across programs, and also as part of a broader ecosystem of practice and change. 

On a patio, two elderly folks sketch together on an iPad.
PASJ-supported Belchertown Cultural Center; Richard Dresser, left, 68, of Amherst, a former resident at the Belchertown State School, works with Olive Smith of the Belchertown Justice Collaborative on ideas for a mural installed on the grounds of the former school | photo by Kevin Gutting – Hampshire Gazette Staff – 2021

How the assessment is unfolding

The Public Art Impact Assessment launched in summer 2025. 

The timeline for the assessment has four phases from 2025 to 2027.
Overview of phases and milestones in NEFA’s Public Art impact assessment

So far, our work has included:

Formation of an Impact Advisory Committee 

A group of artists, practitioners, and field leaders who serve as trusted thought partners, helping to ground the work, hold accountability, and ensure relevance to the field. See below for a list of our impact advisors. 

  • Annis Sengupta, Metropolitan Area Planning Council
  • Lori Lobenstine, Design Studio for Social Intervention
  • Jen Krava, Forecast Public Art
  • Giselle Guillen Martinez, artist, past panelist
  • Kara Eliot-Ortega, Kresge Foundation, former City of Boston, MOAC
  • Kamaria Carrington, Ujima Project, former NEFA public art team
  • Kim Szeto, Senior Program Director, Public Art, NEFA
  • Jessica Wong Camhi, Program Manager, Public Art, NEFA
  • Harold Steward, Executive Director, NEFA
  • Sharon Timmel, Senior Development Director, NEFA
  • Kelsey Spitalny, Interim Manager of Program Strategy, NEFA
  • Jeffrey Lyons Filiault, Senior Communications Manager, NEFA

Reviewing Team Public Art’s Initial Theory of Change 

When Team Public Art launched its spatial justice grants in 2020, they had hopes, expectations, and hypotheses about what value this type of grantmaking might bring. We call this framework a Theory of Change, and it articulates how NEFA’s public art investments contribute to change over time.

Rather than testing these hypotheses against the field, we are observing how these dynamics already show up across practice, relationships, and outcomes. 

Early-stage Spatial Mapping and Analysis 

We have begun mapping where NEFA public art dollars have flowed across New England using geospatial software that helps us create, manage, analyze, and plot geographic data. You can see this in one of our preliminary maps below:

A gray map of New England with green dots where there is program activity.
A Geographic Information System (GIS) map showing PASJ, CISJ, and PALF funding distribution across New England.

This map shows the geographic distribution of NEFA public art funding across New England. Our mapping work will continue to evolve as the assessment progresses, and we’ll overlay contextual data to better understand the reach and ripple effects of NEFA’s grantmaking.

Preparation for deeper field engagement 

We’re currently working on developing additional ways to hear from YOU - the field of public art making. Participate in our grant recipient survey, below; this survey will help us to gather additional perspectives and experiences, and later this winter, we’ll be facilitating small group and one-on-one conversations to better trace the impacts of public art making grantees. 

Complete the Grant Recipient Survey


What’s next?

In the coming months, the assessment will continue through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including:

  • Distribution of the grantee and applicant survey (January 2026)

    Complete the Grant Recipient Survey

  • Small group and one-on-one conversations
  • Continued mapping and data analysis to trace ripple effects
  • Development of case studies
  • Planning for a field-wide convening to share early insights (Stay tuned!) 

Together, these steps will help NEFA better understand how public art creates value across communities and how future grantmaking can continue to support artists navigating complex public realities with care, creativity, and impact.


How to stay engaged? 

This impact assessment is a shared learning process. It is rooted in the work artists and communities have already been doing for many years, often under challenging conditions, and it seeks to make those contributions more visible, legible, and supported.

We invite you to stay engaged as this work continues:

We look forward to continuing this learning alongside the field and to sharing what emerges in the months ahead.

Stay Connected

Receive the latest news, grant offerings, and community events.

Sign up